Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt managed to drag themselves away from the kids and check out the “Inglourious Basterds” premiere in Hollywood. This does not surprise me considering the moving involves Nazi killings and the French, who couldn’t beat themselves out of a wet paper bag. After all, Angelina Jolie is a such a humanitarian, this films seems like something she would definitely want to see. And speaking of see, you have got to see the rest of the photos of Angelina because Jesus Christ Angelina Jolie is still the hottest piece of ass on the planet and it’s not even close.

Here’s a nude sculpture of Angelina Jolie titled “Landmark For Breastfeeding” by New York based artist Daniel Edwards. It’s scheduled to be displayed in Oklahoma which sounds like a great idea. Because there’s nothing the Midwest loves more than activist celebrities. And art.

According to the National Enquirer, Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie’s “fairytale romance” has imploded. From the tabloid:

Brad Pitt has moved out after a furious bust-up with Angelina Jolie – and friends fear the couple is heading for an ugly legal battle that will tear their family apart! The Enquirer has also learned Brad plans to ask for custody of ALL six children if their split ends up in court, where a judge may have to work out who gets what of their $200 million fortune.

Insiders say the couple’s fairytale romance imploded when Brad, 45, confronted Angelina over not devoting enough time to him, while he’s been caring for their children – Maddox, 7, Pax, 5, Zahara, 4, Shiloh, 2, and 8-month-old twins Knox and Vivienne.

“It ended up with a big shouting match,” an insider told The Enquirer. “They may end up splitting for good, and if it comes to that, Brad is going to ask for custody of all the children,” the insider said.

This story is fake for one obvious reason: No guy on earth would want sole custody of six kids – especially if three of them aren’t even yours. What’s more likely is that a guy would actually pay his ex to keep his annoying kids as far away from him as possible. These payments would be for the children’s welfare and presumably made on a monthly basis – as a kind of “support” if you will. If only there were a legal term for that type of arrangement . . .